“Address the appeal for democracy. Stop the threat of violence.”

Sent on behalf of the signatories

“Address the appeal for democracy.  Stop the threat of violence.”

– an open appeal to the Government of Chief Executive C.Y. Leung

Starting from yesterday, there were rampant speculations about the HKSAR authorities’ determination to use brutal force to remove protesters appealing for democracy in Hong Kong.  Prompted by their concern for the safety of students, a number of academics have issued calls for students to withdraw from the public demonstration to avoid risking their personal safety. We share those academics’ concerns, but would like to stress that the fundamental solution to the current saga should lie with concrete action by the authorities to address the people’s demand.

We, the undersigned, jointly express our grave concern at the current situation of Hong Kong.  We are extremely disturbed by rumours that the HKSAR authorities would go down the path of brutality to remove the protesters by force.  We are even more annoyed by the apathy of Hong Kong’s law-enforcement agents, which has resorted to the use of force in resolving an issue of political nature.  Worse still, in a high-handed manner.

Two weeks have passed since our students kicked off their boycott of classes. Their call for dialogue has been greeted with volleys of tear gas.  Instead of dispersing the protesters, such action has ignited public anger and led to the proliferation of more “occupy” actions around town.  None of the officials in charge of the action has been held responsible.  Not even a word of apology has been offered to the public.  In an exhibition of their resilience, students and fellow protesters have continued to stand together to ask the authorities for dialogue despite the use of force.  However, as the preparatory discussion for the dialogue was underway, there emerged the situation in various places when triads had gone on the offensives in attacking the protesters. Police inaction has resulted in many of the thugs going at large.  In view of the development, students had no choice but to terminate the dialogue with officials until proper action is taken to look into the attack.  Until now, the authorities have turned a blind eye to students’ call for investigation.  There is no action whatsoever to address the call for curbing triads’ use of force.  [Against this background, we consider the recent rumours of further use of brutal force to remove protesters from the scenes to be highly disturbing].  They show the authorities’ intention to go down the dangerous path of resolving the political deadline by sheer force.

Indeed, the students’ appeals are very humble.  They ask for a universal suffrage with real choice by the people as the foundation of good governance.  Yet the response of the authorities to their two weeks of appeals were tear gas and triad violence, as well as a completely inflexible stance on the part of the government, coupled by the threat of force.  We believe that such tough and rigid approach is against the rule of proper governance.  It is completely unconducive to the forging of consensus in the Hong Kong community over the issue of electoral reform.  If indeed the authorities are to go down the path of brutal suppression, not only will the current political stalemate continue.  It will also trigger further escalation of the conflict in the community and bring more rigorous counter-action.  The resulting damage will be hard to heal.

This is a positive signal underlining the peaceful and rational approach on the part of the protesters.  We call on the government to change its course before it is too late.  It must respond to the students’ appeal with concrete and substantive action.  We urge that it stop shying away from the core issue of Hong Kong’s electoral reform, which should form the basis of its dialogue with the students.  We are opposed to the use brutal force on our people whose pure intention is to seek rational dialogue with the government.  Any use of excessive force will only split the society further.  No doubt this will be deplored by the people of Hong Kong.

Media enquires: Professor SING Ming, somsing@ust.hk

SING Ming, Associate Professor, Department Social Sciences, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

F. Yeung, Associate Professor, Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of HK.

To Yiu Ming, School of Journalism , Hong Kong Baptist University

Ho Chi Kwan, Retired Professor, Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Chan Stephan

Ho Sik Ying

Kenneth Yip

Sing Ming

Benson Wong

YC Chen

Mirana Szeto

Rikkie Yeung

Chan Ka Lok

Ting Nam Kiu

Lam Wai Man

Lam Ka Nei

Wong Hung

Edmond Chiang

Ho Wing Chung

Edward Yiu

CHONG Yiu-Kwong

孔寶華, 香港明德學院  副教授

Rick Glofcheski, Professor, Faculty of Law, HKU

CHU Wai Chi, Assistant Professor, Hong Kong Polytechnic University

霍玉貞 (香港中文大學圖書館)

Wong Victor C W

黃昌榮 香港浸會大學社會工作系  教授

LEUNG Yan-Wing

陸鳳萍, 明愛專上學院社會科學  實習導師

姚松炎, 中文大學地理與資源管理學系  副教授

Lee, Tsor-kui [APSS]

李楚翹, 理大應用社會科學系  助理敎授

TSOI Kcon-Wah

蔡冠華, 香港中文大學香港教育研究所  專業顧問

梁恩榮, 香港教育學院  副教授

Alvin So

李詠怡, 香港大學政治與公共行政系  教授

莊耀洸, 香港教育學院  專任導師

Victor Chan, Assistant Registrar, Faculty of Medicine, HKU

Joseph Chan

陳智豪, 香港中文大學社會工作學系助理教授

Cheung Chor-Yung

羅金義, 香港教育學院社會科學系副教授

Rick Glofcheski

鄭樹坤, 香港科技大學電子及計算機工程學系教授

馮慧心, 恒生管理學院中文系講師

尹國輝, 香港樹仁大學新聞與傳播學系高級講師

朱燕華, 浸會大學社會學系副教授

楊區麗潔, 香港大學政治及公共行政系


Fung Wai Wah

陳成斌, 恒生管理學院通識教育系助理教授

劉誠, 香港浸會大學社會科學榮譽講座敎授

林傑遜, 香港科技大學計算機科學及工程學系講師